(begin transcript)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Office of the Spokesman
May 7, 2008
REMARKS
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
At the Council of the Americas 38th Annual Meeting
May 7, 2008
Loy Henderson Auditorium
Washington, D.C.
(4:00 p.m. EDT)
SECRETARY RICE: Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you.
Thanks, Bill for that really wonderful introduction. I should
let you do all my introductions. And I want to thank you
for your great leadership of this organization and to all
of you here for all that this organization does.
I especially want to welcome President Torrijos. We had
a very good meeting just before coming here and he met,
of course, with the President yesterday. Mr. President,
you represent the future of leadership in the Americas,
and we're very proud of the way that Panama is developing
and we're very proud to call you our friend.
Members of the diplomatic corps, distinguished guests,
ladies and gentlemen, it's a pleasure to be back here with
the Council of the Americas here in the State Department.
You do so much to advance our common interests and our common
values throughout this hemisphere.
I want to thank you for strengthening the ties between
peoples -- our NGOs, our teachers, our students, and our
business communities. I want to thank you for your tireless
efforts to educate about our hemisphere and to push for
our common interests.
And you know, it struck me this morning that this is going
to be my last time speaking to the Council of the Americas
as Secretary. Thank you for recognizing that that's not
an applause line. (Laughter.)
But seriously though, it's a temptation to, at this time
in an administration to start to look to the past and to
look at all that we've done together. I don't really want
to dwell on this too much because there's never been a time
in modern history when our country's relationship with the
hemisphere is more oriented to the future.
But if you'll allow me for one moment to go back and look
at what has happened since 2001. I would submit to you that
we've witnessed nothing less than a social revolution in
most of our hemisphere in recent years and its cause has
been democracy. Democracy has been opening up old, elite-dominated
politics to millions who had been on the margins of their
societies: the poor and the disadvantaged and indigenous
peoples and minorities. These men and women have at last
become active democratic citizens, and they are demanding
that their governments work for them. They are addressing
long-standing problems of poverty and inequality and social
exclusion that have ever been so real in our hemisphere.
If I could sum up this process of change, I would say it's
been a time for inclusion, a time for people to feel at
home, and to participate in the destiny of their nations.
This revolution has realigned the politics of the Americas.
New leaders have emerged, from both the left and the right
-- responsible democratic leaders who are rejecting old
ideological shibboleths and working pragmatically to expand
opportunity, to reduce poverty, and to ensure security.
They are showing that good governance, the rule of law,
democracy and markets can deliver people’s rightfully
high expectations of the governments that they have elected.
This belief was reflected in the outcomes of nearly all
of the 17 elections held in 2006, for instance. And it's
been the real story in recent years of democracy: Not some
left turn. Not some populist rejection of markets and trade,
but indeed the creation of a new hemispheric consensus that,
as our Inter-American Democratic Charter states, “democracy
is essential for the social, political, and economic development
of the peoples of the Americas.”
This underscores something really important -- that by
democracy, people in this hemisphere just don't mean a political
mechanism for transferring power. They mean democracy in
broader social and economic terms, a system in which all
have access to opportunity and the mobility that it brings.
To be sure, there have been exceptions to this broader
positive trend -- a few places where rulers have exploited
peoples’ legitimate fears, and needs, and longings
in order to expand their own autocratic power. These are
heartbreaking setbacks for our hemisphere. But though some
rulers may clamor to draw attention to themselves, it does
not alter the fact that they are on the wrong side of history
in the Americas, history is passing them by.
The main idea is this: Democracy is literally changing
the character of countries in the Americas. It is producing
popular governments that are redefining their national interests,
engaging with one another in new ways, and adapting their
societies to be competitive in the global economy -- all
in ways it would have been unthinkable a couple of decades
ago. In short, there is a political and diplomatic ferment
in our hemisphere that is palpable and overwhelmingly positive.
And the nature of leadership in the Americas is changing,
too. Canada is building new and far-reaching partnerships
in this region, and committing its talents and its resources
to advance our shared values, not just in this hemisphere,
but beyond it -- in Afghanistan. Brazil, a regional leader,
is an emerging global player and it's looking outward as
never before, and we are building a partnership -- the United
States and Brazil together that will matter for decades
to come in this world. A relationship that was always defined
by potential is now being defined by accomplishments. And
when the two largest democracies in the hemisphere cooperate
to promote energy independence, the eradication of malaria
in Africa, and the fight against racism and intolerance,
the impact can be profound.
And at this time of sweeping change, the United States
is also changing its role. Frankly, I think
since 2001, we have learned to be better partners for this
region. We've come to see more clearly that the quest for
social justice is the defining issue for most countries
and most peoples, that the realization of its huge implications
for a country’s success means that the United States
must position ourselves to be part of the solution. We have
sought and we've built strong relationships with democratic
governments on the left and on the right. We have charged
no ideological price for America's friendship.
And we've been actively able to do this because we have
stayed consistently engaged. President Bush has made more
trips in the Americas than any president in U.S. history.
He has received more leaders here in Washington from Latin
America and the Caribbean than any of his predecessors.
And beyond governments, our engagement has spanned the full
spectrum of our societies -- our teachers and our students,
our NGOs and our faith communities, and of course, people
like you in the private sector. We have deepened the enduring
connections of culture and commerce, family and friendship.
The broad engagement was evident in last year’s White
House Conference on the Americas, which many of you attended.
And I can tell you, increasingly, when I meet the young
people of the region, as I just recently did, youth ambassadors
from Nicaragua and from Bolivia and from Venezuela, I see
that the faces of the Americas are so diverse, and that
diversity is finally being represented in the people who
are getting access to those wonderful scholarships and fellowships
that will make them leaders in their countries in the future.
I believe then, in recent years, we've seen a convergence
of ideals and interests. Among nations in the region, and
amidst all the different traditions that we embody, we agree
on first principles -- that the path to greater opportunity
and social justice is different for every country, but the
features are similar: democracy and the rule of law, responsible
governance and open economies, investment in the health
and education of people.
Here in this country, among our Administration and in the
Congress, and among our public and private sectors, I believe
we've forged agreement, bipartisan agreement, on the first
principles of our policy in the Americas, that the potential
of our hemisphere is enormous, that the success of our neighbors
is intimately linked to our own, that we can now build partnerships
rooted not only in common interests but in common values,
and that we must support democratic leaders in tackling
the challenges of poverty, inequality, and social exclusion.
Now, it's not to say that differences don't still remain
between the United States and our neighbors -- between our
neighbors and even perhaps within the United States itself.
They do. But because we share first principles, because
we are committed to one another’s success, and because
we are engaging with one another, communicating with one
another, our differences do not define us. Indeed, exchanged
honestly and respectfully, our differences can strengthen
us.
Most democratic governments in our hemisphere -- left,
right and center -- are doing the right things to help their
people prosper. They're opening markets and expanding opportunity
and boosting trade and attracting investment and fighting
corruption and enforcing the rule of law. We respect the
results that they are achieving, and we are supporting them.
Under President Bush, and with the support of the Congress
and our people, the United States has doubled development
assistance in Latin America and the Caribbean since 2001.
We have led multilateral efforts to forgive old debts that
too long had saddled the potential of some of the poorest
countries in our region. And through the Millennium Challenge
Account initiative, we have created new incentives to reduce
poverty -- through just governance, economic freedom, and
investment in people.
This consensus on development recognizes the vital importance
of free and fair trade. When governments invest in their
people, trade can enable countries to fuel their own economic
and social transformation.
Building on NAFTA, our Administration has negotiated ten
free trade agreements since 2001 with our partners in the
Americas. If our Congress passes our agreements with Panama
and Colombia, an issue that I'll return to in a moment,
we will have effectively created an unbroken chain of free-trading
nations from the top of Canada to the tip of Chile. These
FTAs are the strategic platform that enable our democracies
to reach across the Pacific and compete successfully with
the rising powers of Asia.
Together, these efforts represent a new approach to development
rooted in partnership and mutual responsibility. This is
furthering the common hemispheric vision of a just society,
one in which self-improvement and social mobility are the
prospect of all citizens, not the privilege of a few.
The new democratic consensus in our hemisphere also recognizes
that our economic and social development must be defended.
So we have built partnerships, again, rooted in shared first
principles and mutual responsibility to ensure our collective
hemispheric security.
Canada, Mexico and the United States have created the Security
and Prosperity Partnership underscoring that North American
relationships bring enormous benefits, like jobs, and energy
security, and lower prices, to the citizens of all three
countries. Today, the $14 trillion economic zone of North
America is undisputedly the platform for long-term success
in the world. And through the Security and Prosperity Partnership,
we are now building the shared capacity to defend our livelihoods
from any challenge and to respond to any emergency that
might threaten our success.
We are doing so in other ways, too. Through the Merida
Initiative, which is now before the Congress, the United
States, Mexico, and the nations of Central America will
cooperate to defend our societies and economies from criminal
gangs and drug traffickers. This is unprecedented. For the
first time, we and our neighbors are developing regional
security strategies to combat threats that we can only defeat
together.
We've maintained partnerships to support two democracies
in winning their struggles for sustainable security.
So through the work of a courageous government and people,
and with a long-term commitment from the United States,
Colombia has transformed itself from a state on the verge
of failure not seven years ago to a nation now on the brink
of success, whose democratic government is reclaiming its
country from narco-terrorists and expanding opportunity
for its people.
And in Haiti, many nations in the Americas have joined
together in an unprecedented partnership for democratic
state-building, marrying security and peacekeeping efforts
to reconstruction and development, to try and support finally
for the people of Haiti the creation of effective institutions.
Taken together, our many common endeavors with our democratic
neighbors represent partnerships that will meet our present
and future challenges. And building this has been possible
because the United States has been deeply engaged. The challenge
in the months and years ahead is to strengthen the practical
points of consensus that define that engagement. And much
of that challenge, frankly, is internal to the United States.
There are a lot of tough issues before us, or soon to be
before us, that will test the principles of an engagement
in the Americas. One is trade, specifically the agreements
we've concluded with Colombia and Panama. In recent decades,
administrations of both parties, along with majorities in
Congress, sustained bipartisan U.S. support for free and
fair trade. But I must tell you that today, this consensus
is under fire. Trade is absolutely vital to our nation’s
competitiveness, but we cannot afford to look at trade just
as a domestic issue. Trade is also essential to our foreign
policy, to our national interests, to the security and prosperity
of our neighbors, and thus, to the security and prosperity
of the United States.
The majority of our citizens in the hemisphere want more
trade not less. And if the leaders of Congress reject free
trade agreements with Colombia and Panama, it will be they
who is neglecting this hemisphere. And it will signal only
one thing: retreat from that that we have achieved, retreat
from our nation’s long-standing engagement and leadership
in the Americas, and retreat from two democratic partners
who want and need our support. I assure you: Those who will
benefit most from disengagement or retreat would be those
who least share our values.
There's another challenge that is coming, and that is the
transition in Cuba -- the only country in the Americas not
ruled by a government that its people have chosen. We respect
the dignity and the talent of the Cuban people. And we believe
unequivocally that Cuba deserves, no less than any other
nation in the Americas, to choose its own future freely,
without outside interference.
Any attempt to ease Cuba into the 21st century through
relatively small and highly controlled economic openings
will not work in the long term. The Cuban regime must show
that it's got the confidence in itself and in its people
to stop using the secret police to control political discourse.
The regime must and should remove the fear factor from Cuba’s
political life.
We are eager to support Cuba and its talented people in
transforming its society. We want to engage with Cuba. We
want to engage its people as free citizens, not as subjects.
So ladies and gentlemen, when I think back over this time,
I arrive at one basic idea: What a difference a decade can
make. What a remarkable period of consolidation for market-led,
socially committed democracy across the region. The democracies
of the Americas are now interacting and speaking with one
another and working with one another as never before. They
are experimenting with a wide variety of new ideas to foster
greater integration. They are more active in the rest of
the world and more engaged in the global economy, with increasing
confidence and success.
Our different countries represent many different traditions
and many different cultures. But we are defining a common
future, a common future grounded in common values: freedom
and equality, human dignity and social justice. These values
are our values, America's values. They link this hemisphere,
and they firmly ground the United States as a firm part
of this proud and free hemisphere.
The people of the Americas are rightfully impatient for
better lives, they are holding their democratic leaders
to higher standards, and they increasingly have the option
to do that. And I would just say just one final word about
the United States. To remain influential in our hemisphere,
we must remain engaged, and to remain engaged we must be
really present. We must continue to show our hemispheric
partners that we understand their problems, that we can
and want to be active in helping to solve them, and that
their success is our success.
This is in keeping with our national traditions. It has
and will increasingly define our role in the region. And
I am confident that it can form the foundation of a new
and enduring engagement for a hemisphere of democracy, prosperity,
and peace.
Thank you very much. (Applause.)
MR. RHODES: The Secretary has kindly offered to take a
couple of questions. But before we do that, I must say that
even when she leaves this present post, we will be calling
on you from time to time, Condi, to come back and speak
with us. And we thank you very much for all your support
here. So I think the Secretary's open to have a couple of
questions. She has also stated that she would like to stay
on to hear President Torrijos and his words. So as the Chinese
like to say, this is a win-win situation. (Laughter.)
So can we have a -- any questions here for the Secretary?
Yes.
QUESTION: (Inaudible) European (Inaudible) Finance. I've
been doodling some interesting questions. But I would like
to ask you instead, in leaving, what would you like your
legacy to look like 25 years from now when our children
are looking at the history books?
SECRETARY RICE: Well, thank you. Well, I'll tell you why
I'm not usually one to talk much about legacy, because I'll
tell you that I keep four portraits of Secretaries of State
near me. One is Thomas Jefferson -- everybody's got Thomas
Jefferson. I keep George Marshall -- everybody has George
Marshall, probably the greatest American Secretary of State.
But I keep two that remind me that history's judgment and
today's headlines are rarely the same. One is Dean Acheson,
who was the father of NATO, but probably at the time was
most remembered for who lost China. And the other is Seward,
who was remembered for Seward's Icebox. He bought Alaska
for some $17 million and it was called Seward's Folly. I
think we're glad now that he bought it. So that's why I
tend not to talk much about legacy.
But let me just tell you what I hope we've left in place,
particularly concerning the Americas. And I'm quite serious
when I say, I think we've become a better partner. Fair,
we have to admit that between the United States and Latin
America, the narrative hasn't always been a positive one,
because of our history, because of the long history dating
really all the way back to our founding. It's not always
been a narrative of equal partnership and respect. And I
think it has colored from time to time the way that the
region has viewed the United States and what we've tried
to do. And for our part, we've made our mistakes, too. Perhaps
some times being driven by larger global concerns and an
ideological tinge that made it difficult to sometimes see
the clarity of what was going on in the region.
And so I think that what we've done in recent years is
we've written a new narrative. And it's a narrative that
is one that is clearly shared, because it is about democracy
and democratic development. But even that needed some refining,
because it was democracy, and it was free trade, and it
was micro economic soundness and economic growth.
But the last link had to be that democracies were going
to be held accountable for something else. They were going
to be held accountable for whether or not they could provide
for their people, whether or not people's lives actually
do get better. And so the effort to make social justice
a part of our language too, not the language of the left,
not the language of the right, but the language of democracy,
and to work with countries whatever side of the political
spectrum they came from.
We have great relations with Brazil or Chile or Uruguay,
on the other side with Colombia and with others. So, it
hasn't mattered. And I think that has really helped because
as we focus together on democracies delivering for their
people, good, honest governments that are fighting corruption,
securing their people, making the right economic choices,
but also making life better for their people, I think it's
helped us to write a new narrative.
And if I could add just one other, and perhaps this comes
from my own particular background, I have been very gratified
by what I think is finally a movement in the region to have
indigenous peoples and minorities more represented. When
I was recently in Brazil, I signed with the minister there
for racial justice -- I signed a document on combating racism
and promoting inclusion in our exchanges in education and
so forth. And that's important to me because Afro- Colombians
or Afro-Brazilians who, unfortunately, have been at the
margins of society need to be brought in. And given America's
own history of having had a painful experience, I've said
our country was born with a birth defect -- slavery -- and
yet we've managed to the point that now, after Thomas Jefferson,
a slave owner, here I stand as Secretary of State. So I
think that engaging the hemisphere on that issue has been
very important to me. And plus, I had a great time in Bahia.
What a wonderful place. (Laughter.)
MR. RHODES: Okay. We have time for one more question. Do
we have one from over there?
Yes. (Inaudible) I think you had your hand up. You didn't
have your hand up. I thought you did.
Okay. Yes.
QUESTION: My name is (inaudible) and I'm with CHF International.
During the day, the entire day, it's been fascinating. We've
been hearing things about food crisis, the price of food
rising. We've been hearing about security. We've been hearing
about the gains in the narco-trafficking in Central America.
For me what it all comes down to is jobs. If people are
working they can buy food. If they're working, they're not
going to want to trade in drugs. They'd rather do something
licit than something illicit.
What do you see as the priorities in terms of workforce
development, in terms of jobs creation, and what role do
you see the United States play in that -- in the hemisphere.
A lot being done in Haiti right now in terms of jobs creation.
What other efforts do you see as priorities for the coming
years?
SECRETARY RICE: I think the key is -- first of all, you
can't -- you aren't going to have jobs without growth. And
so helping to promote growth, for instance, through trade
and through good, sound economic policies is a sort of macro
picture. But of course then, though, you have to have populations
that are capable of taking advantage of that macro picture.
And I've seen really two things that work very well.
I was in Guatemala with the President and we were up in
the highlands. And we met there subsistence farmers who
were no longer subsistence farmers because they had been
trained on the ground to take their vegetables and fruits,
and to be able to do vertically integrated processing so
that they were going right to market -- markets that were
made available by the Central American Free Trade Agreement.
And so it comes then, back full circle, to training people
to take advantage. That was a USAID project with those people.
So I think we've tried to integrate our approaches where
the training and the improvement of processes links up with
free trade agreement to make it possible for people to have
jobs. And these people are now employing people rather than
just being subsistence farmers.
The other is obviously education, because there -- without
primary and secondary education and ultimately tertiary
education, it's going to be very difficult for any country
to compete. And it is fine to think about jobs that can
be at the more primary levels of economic development, but
increasingly the pressures are upward. And so the United
States has been very involved with a number of countries
in educational opportunity, for the teacher training and
training of teachers, training of health workers, which
we're doing actually in Panama. And we also have been very
active on the university front. I have with the Chilean
Foreign Minister, for instance, a university education program
that we are promoting to give to Chilean students who are
from underprivileged areas and might not have access to
English language training so that they can then go to universities
around the world.
So I think there's a lot that we can do to help. But you
have to keep pursuing the growth. You have to keep pursuing
the trade. And it serves both of us well.
Thank you very much. (Applause.)
MR. RHODES: We wish the Secretary great luck in her various
efforts at peace around the world. And I must say, particularly
your efforts in the Middle East.
(end transcript)