Washington -- Recognition of the link between climate change
and health is growing, driving efforts of those who are the
front-line responders -- public health professionals -- to
make sure health care systems and global populations are prepared
for the worst.
Scientists worldwide agree that climate is changing as
a result of human activity, and climate influences the biological
functions basic to life.
On April 7, the theme for the World Health Organization’s
(WHO) World Health Day was “Protecting Health from
Climate Change.” In the United States, the theme of
National Public Health Week, April 7-11, was “Climate
Change: Our Health in the Balance.” On April 9, a
U.S. House of Representatives committee heard testimony
from climate and health experts on the same topic. (See
“World Health Day Targets
Human Effects of Climate Change.”)
“The public health system will be a front-line responder
to potential emergency conditions caused by climate change,”
Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American
Public Health Association (APHA), told the House Select
Committee on Energy Dependence and Global Warming. “It
will also play a key role in informing, educating and empowering
the nation to make the changes needed to mitigate the problem.”
The APHA, Benjamin added, has had a policy on climate change
and health since 1995.
ENERGY POLICY = HEALTH POLICY
People around the world already are feeling the effects
of climate-sensitive diseases that kill millions, according
to WHO. Malnutrition causes more than 3.5 million deaths
a year, diarrheal diseases kill more than 1.8 million annually
and malaria nearly 1 million.
Other recent events foreshadow a climate-altered future
-- the 2003 European heat wave that killed 70,000; major
Rift Valley fever outbreaks in Africa; 2005’s Hurricane
Katrina, which killed 1,800 and displaced thousands; malaria
in the East African highlands; and cholera epidemics in
Bangladesh.
“Global warming is unlike many other health threats,”
said Dr. Jonathan Patz, a professor in the Department of
Population Health Sciences and at the Nelson Institute,
both at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, “because,
unlike single-agent toxins or microbes, climate change affects
multiple pathways of harmful exposures to our health.”
The policy changes needed to address this problem, he told
the committee, will be large if the nation is serious about
protecting the public from the effects of climate change.
Reducing fossil-fuel burning, for example -- in part by
making it practical for more people to travel by foot, bicycle
or public transportation rather than by car -- would reduce
air pollution, improve personal fitness and reduce greenhouse
gas emissions and subsequent global warming.
“The challenges posed by climate change urgently
demand improving public health infrastructure, energy conservation
and urban planning policies,” he added. “As
such, climate change can present enormous health risks and
opportunities quite directly via improved fitness, reduced
obesity and improved air quality.”
PROTECTING PUBLIC HEALTH
Around the world, public health officials are assessing
the measures already in place and determining future needs
for protecting health from climate change, with a focus
on women and children in developing nations and other vulnerable
populations.
WHO and its partners, for example -- the U.N. Environmental
Programme, the Food and Agriculture Organization and the
U.N. World Meteorological Organization -- are devising a
work plan and research agenda to get better estimates of
the scale and nature of health vulnerability and to identify
health protection strategies and tools, including better
surveillance and forecasting systems and stronger basic
health services.
In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) leads efforts to anticipate the health
effects of climate change, to ensure systems are in place
to detect and track them and take steps to prepare for,
respond to and manage associated risks.
CDC scientists already have expertise in disease surveillance,
environmental health, geographic information systems and
modeling, preparedness planning and training, said Dr. Howard
Frumkin, director of the CDC’s National Center for
Environmental Health and of the Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry, and the agency has identified the
following ways to meet the health challenge of climate change:
• Improve surveillance systems for food-borne, water-borne,
vector (insect)-borne, zoonotic (animal diseases in people)
and other diseases with state and local partners;
• Build research capacity by boosting staffs experienced
in epidemiology, infectious disease ecology, disaster preparedness,
modeling and forecasting, climatology and health science
and communication.
• Support capacity in universities to research the
links between climate change and public health.
• Provide communication and technical assistance
on the health effects of climate change to health professionals,
state and local health departments, universities, science
teachers, community groups, state and local officials, faith-based
organizations, industry and the public.
“While we still need more emphasis on public health
preparedness for climate change,” Frumkin told the
committee, “many of our existing programs and scientific
expertise provide a solid foundation to move forward.”
More information about climate change and health is available
on the CDC
and WHO
Web sites.